2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Beam Cracks by Solution of an Inverse Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [6] proposed a new region growth algorithm to detect road cracks, which is not suitable for detecting small and scattered cracks in the road. e extended finite element formula (XFEM) combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) has been proven to be effective in detecting structural defects [7][8][9], but this method also has many limitations. In this article, a novel method [10] is used to improve the convolutional neural network [11,12], so that the convolutional neural network can automatically detect the crack in the image and mark the corresponding position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [6] proposed a new region growth algorithm to detect road cracks, which is not suitable for detecting small and scattered cracks in the road. e extended finite element formula (XFEM) combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) has been proven to be effective in detecting structural defects [7][8][9], but this method also has many limitations. In this article, a novel method [10] is used to improve the convolutional neural network [11,12], so that the convolutional neural network can automatically detect the crack in the image and mark the corresponding position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sutar et al (2015) investigated transverse crack in cantilever beam by proposing a neural network based controller. Crack stiffness to beam elemental stiffness matrix was used to obtain a homogenous linear elastic beam finite element by Teidj et al (2016) and used the measurement of the changes in the beam frequencies and observed their variations to detect the crack defect characteristics. Thatoi et al (2014) described the Cascade Forward Back Propagation (CFBP) network to detect cracks in structural beams with the idea of changes in the natural frequencies and their measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from non-destructive methods, vibration-based crack identification methods have been researched widely because they are time saving, inexpensive and non labourintensive. Unlike NDT methods, vibration-based methods can identify both global and local positions of crack [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%