2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of biomarkers to improve diagnostic sensitivity of sporadic colorectal cancer in patients with low preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen by clinical proteomic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This protein is considered as potential biomarker for colorectal cancer. Chen et al have confirmed that the serum level of Alpha‐enolase in 26 of the 48 patients with colorectal cancer is threefold higher than that in healthy people by immunoblot analyses . LDH is also a well‐known biomarker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This protein is considered as potential biomarker for colorectal cancer. Chen et al have confirmed that the serum level of Alpha‐enolase in 26 of the 48 patients with colorectal cancer is threefold higher than that in healthy people by immunoblot analyses . LDH is also a well‐known biomarker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Different proteomic technologies have been used to find new cancer biomarkers for CRC employed for risk prediction, diagnosis, prognosis, staging and monitoring treatment response of this disease. First proteomic studies focused on two‐dimensional electrophoresis (2‐DE) to characterize diseased vs control proteomes in combination with MALDI‐TOF MS or LC‐MS/MS . Nevertheless, these proteomic approaches involve hydrophobicity, size and solubility limitations of protein samples, and label‐free LC‐MS technologies have been used as an alternative approach in the search of CRC biomarkers .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 in combination with MALDI-TOF MS 17,18 or LC-MS/MS. [19][20][21] Nevertheless, these proteomic approaches involve hydrophobicity, size and solubility limitations of protein samples, 22 and label-free LC-MS technologies have been used as an alternative approach in the search of CRC biomarkers. 21 Nowadays, SWATH technique provides comprehensive and permanent records of all detectable molecular species and this proteomic technology is emerging as a powerful tool for CRC research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFEMP2) were better than CEA based on receiver operating characteristic analyses [28]. These new protein biomarkers might address the shortage of current CRC biomarkers, such as low CEA tumors seem to be inhibiting unique protein signatures that can be used as biomarkers for the detection of CRC in these patients with low CEA, for whom therefore serum CEA lacks sensitivity regarding the detection [62]. However, we have to keep in mind that CEA itself is not a good biomarker for CRC diagnosis.…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges In Developing Proteomics-based mentioning
confidence: 99%