2006
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-3-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling

Abstract: Background: Quantification of in-vivo biomolecule mass transport and reaction rate parameters from experimental data obtained by Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) is becoming more important.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, it is increased. The approach avoids calculation of k and step length in each iteration and therefore is computationally cheap [76].…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, it is increased. The approach avoids calculation of k and step length in each iteration and therefore is computationally cheap [76].…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) and (3), they should be solved numerically. Using Taylor series expansion, the finite difference approximation of the h-based-form Richards equation can be developed as [13,47,55]: …”
Section: Governing Equations and Discretizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentation and process-based mathematical modeling are two orthodox approaches which have been extensively used to analyze fluid flow in different systems with varying degree of complexity. While experimentation may better represent the micro-and macro-environment of the systems; they are time-consuming, tedious, expensive, and often impose unrealistic and simplified initial and boundary conditions on transport domain and processes in, especially, open systems [55]. An efficient alternative is developing state-of-the-art process-based mathematical models with enhanced prediction capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 1 presents eight sets of optimized parameter values obtained by the single-objective optimization using different initial guesses for the hydraulic parameters (the last two columns are from [12] for comparison sake). The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) was calculated by [34]: The units for K s and α are cm d −1 and cm −1 , respectively, while other parameters are dimensionless. The last two columns are from [12] for sake of comparison.…”
Section: Global Mass Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, laboratory scale parameters may not be representative of the large scale system and the results obtained by large scale methods may show considerable variations. Finally, information regarding the uncertainty of model parameters is not readily available using these procedures [31,34]. A promising alternative is parameter optimization by inverse modeling which has been widely used in the past few decades [7,[10][11][12][13][14]16,23,[32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%