2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-012-1606-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of blood and wound isolates of C. canimorsus and C. cynodegmi using VITEK2 and MALDI-TOF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capnocytophaga canimorsus strains can also be identified with MALDI‐TOF (matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight analyser): in one study, it was able to identify six of six blood C. canimorsus strains, 13 of 14 wound strains and two of two ATCC reference strains (Zangenah et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Capnocytophaga canimorsus strains can also be identified with MALDI‐TOF (matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight analyser): in one study, it was able to identify six of six blood C. canimorsus strains, 13 of 14 wound strains and two of two ATCC reference strains (Zangenah et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capnocytophaga cynodegmi , a similar pathogen, may cause several infections, varying from a local wound infection to endocarditis and meningitis, and is more frequently found in the immunocompromised (Khawari et al., ). The clinical characteristics are similar to those of C. canimorsus meningitis and it may be hard to distinguish between C. cynodegmi and C. canimorsus microbiologically (Suzuki et al., ; Zangenah et al., ). As both respond to the recommended empirical antibiotic treatment used for meningitis (Brouwer et al., ), the exact subtyping is clinically less relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. canis was isolated from a human wound specimen, and is thus here defined as a clinical isolate. These isolates have been described in detail in previous studies from our group [2628]. The genomes for all 24 strains were used in the bioinformatic analyses, whereas 16 strains were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing based on consistent and reproducible growth patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs and time-frames for 16S rRNA analyses may be substantial per isolate, depending on sequences and repetitions (Clarridge, 2004;Justesen et al, 2010). There are a number of available conventional diagnostic microbiological tools which were compared for their identification capacity and reliability with MALDI-TOF MS, mostly for clinically relevant bacteria (Risch et al, 2010;van Veen et al, 2010;Saffert et al, 2011;Alvarez-Buylla et al, 2012;El-Bouri et al, 2012;Fang et al, 2012;Meex et al, 2012;Zangenah et al, 2012;Caretto et al, 2013;Jamal et al, 2013;Almuzara et al, 2015, to name a few recent studies).…”
Section: Comparison With Conventional and Molecular Identification Prmentioning
confidence: 99%