Blood doping represents a serious risk in endurance athletes. Blood transfusion practices (either autologous or homologous) have been used since 1960 and, despite the significant improvement in the laboratory methods, only homologous blood transfusion can be detected currently, while for autologous blood transfusion, no validated methods exist. In the last 15 years, a number of drugs have been developed to treat anemic patients. From recombinant erythropoietin to synthetic hemoglobin, all the developed tools are potentially useful to increase the oxygen transport to peripheral tissues in endurance athletes. Thus, the availability of doping-detection methods can only be sustained by the knowledge of any novel therapeutic approach in this field. The identification of the doping molecule is the gold standard of any antidoping campaign; despite this, indirect methods based on the detection of the effects induced by the doping procedure will be a very powerful tool in the near future. Nevertheless, while direct methods are only affected by the sensitivity and the specificity of the method itself (deterministic methods), indirect approaches are affected by the statistic weight of the results (probabilistic methods). Thus, blood doping will be better controlled by the combination of the two approaches.Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 1(6), 793-800 (2006) Despite the legend that Roman legions, as well as mythical vampires, drank the blood of their adversaries to gain strength, rumors report that the first attempts of blood doping began back in the 1960s with athletes withdrawing their own blood, storing it and reinjecting it prior to a competition. This procedure was carried out since it was expected that any increase in the transport of oxygen may result in a significant improvement of the performance of endurance athletes. Along this line, the effects of blood doping were well defined in late 1980s [1] and, in the same period, attempts to detect this procedure were reported [2]. Following that pioneering period, the human recombinant (rh) erythropoietin (EPO) era began. rhEPO was developed for the treatment of severely anemic patients, but was rapidly introduced in endurance sports. In the early and mid-1990s, a number of tests were proposed to detect the abuse of such a molecule in athletes. However, these approaches were, in general, based on the laboratory evidence of the effects of rhEPO administration, such as identification of threshold levels for hematocrit (HCT) and/or hemoglobin (Hb), increase of the soluble transferring receptor [3], reticulocytes [4] and large red blood cells (RBCs) [5], and inhibition of endogenous EPO secretion [101]. Only at the beginning of this millennium was a method to detect the presence of rhEPO in urine samples developed, validated and used in elite competitions, such as the Olympic games [6]. In the same period, an algorithm to calculate the probability of rhEPO abuse was originally described [7].
Present state of blood dopingDespite all these tools and the repeatedly reported ...