2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of brain- and bone-specific breast cancer metastasis genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These niches form as a result of factors secreted by tumor and stroma cells, and can either be newly induced or be adaptations of pre-existing physiological niches, such as stem cell niches of hematopoietic organs [1,5]. Thus, the gene signature associated with poor prognosis facilitates the emergence of metastatic cells in the primary tumor, but the specific set of genes associated with bone metastasis seems responsible for the cellular activities necessary for metastatisation [6][7][8]. For completeness, the metastatic capacity might be considered as a late, acquired event in tumorigenesis and during secondary growth, through epigenetic control of transcription [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These niches form as a result of factors secreted by tumor and stroma cells, and can either be newly induced or be adaptations of pre-existing physiological niches, such as stem cell niches of hematopoietic organs [1,5]. Thus, the gene signature associated with poor prognosis facilitates the emergence of metastatic cells in the primary tumor, but the specific set of genes associated with bone metastasis seems responsible for the cellular activities necessary for metastatisation [6][7][8]. For completeness, the metastatic capacity might be considered as a late, acquired event in tumorigenesis and during secondary growth, through epigenetic control of transcription [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility for this failure could be that the studies were designed to measure outcomes of generalized metastases. Given recent evidence that a large number of MMPs are up-regulated in bone metastases (Kang et al 2003;Nabha et al 2008;Klein et al 2009), primary outcome of bone metastases measurements may have been a more appropriate endpoint to demonstrate clinically significant differences with MMP inhibitors. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the generation of Figure 2, CorrXpression Software was used [28][29]. Only the 121 top-ranked transcripts were used for the correspondence plot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%