in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) To prevent the chance of unintended environmental harm, engineering decisions need to consider an expanded boundary that captures all relevant connected systems. Comprehensive models for sustainable engineering may be developed by combining models at multiple scales. Models at the finest "equipment" scale are engineering models based on fundamental knowledge. At the intermediate "value chain" scale, empirical models represent average production technologies, and at the coarsest "economy" scale, models represent monetary and environmental exchanges for industrial sectors in a national or global economy. However, existing methods for sustainable engineering design ignore the economy scale, while existing methods for life cycle assessment do not consider the equipment scale. This work proposes an integrated, multiscale modeling framework for connecting models from process to planet and using them for sustainable engineering applications. The proposed framework is demonstrated with a toy problem, and potential applications of the framework including current and future work are discussed. V C 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 3332-3352, 2015 Keywords: design, mathematical modeling, multiscale modeling, optimization, sustainability
IntroductionHistory is replete with examples of technologies that were developed and adopted with the intention of enhancing human well-being but, while meeting this goal, caused unintended and unexpected damage to the environment. Prominent examples include formation of the ozone hole due to the use of chlorofluorocarbons, climate change due to reliance on fossil fuels, and aquatic dead zones due to use of artificial fertilizers. This harm to ecosystem services-the basic life support for humanity-can make human activity unsustainable. The underlying causes for these negative impacts include the narrow boundary of traditional engineering that ignores the broader life cycle environmental implications of engineering decisions, and the practice of ignoring the role of ecosystems in enabling engineering activities. Life cycle assessment (LCA) 2,3 and related footprint methods 4,5 developed over the last two decades have become popular for considering the broader impacts of engineering activities. These methods consider activities from "cradle to grave" so that environmental impacts across the entire larger system may be assessed. Decisions based on such analyses are less likely to shift the impact outside the narrow boundary of engineering models and analysis. Cradle-to-grave methods, and LCA in particular, have been used to incorporate sustainability considerations into virtually all engineering fields, including product design, process design, supply chain design, planning and logistics, and economic and policy analysis. [6][7][8][9] Such methods quantify environmental impacts and incorporate them into the decision-making process, in addition to the more traditional technological and economic criteria such as profitab...