High-resolution (HR) electrical mapping is an important clinical research
tool for understanding normal and abnormal gastric electrophysiology. Analyzing
velocities of gastric electrical activity in a reliable and accurate manner can
provide additional valuable information for quantitatively and qualitatively
comparing features across and within subjects, particularly during gastric
dysrhythmias. In this study we compared three methods of estimating velocities
from HR recordings to determine which method was the most reliable for use with
gastric HR electrical mapping. The three methods were i) Simple finite
difference ii) Smoothed finite difference and a iii) Polynomial based method.
With synthetic data, the accuracy of the simple finite difference method
resulted in velocity errors almost twice that of the smoothed finite difference
and the polynomial based method, in the presence of activation time error up to
0.5s. With three synthetic cases under various noise types and levels, the
smoothed finite difference resulted in average speed error of 3.2% and
an average angle error of 2.0° and the polynomial based method had an
average speed error of 3.3% and an average angle error of 1.7°.
With experimental gastric slow wave recordings performed in pigs, the three
methods estimated similar velocities (6.3-7.3 mm/s), but the smoothed finite
difference method had a lower standard deviation in its velocity estimate than
the simple finite difference and the polynomial based method, leading it to be
the method of choice for velocity estimation in gastric slow wave propagation.
An improved method for visualizing velocity fields is also presented.