2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Children's Gender and Age by Listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with findings reported by Amir et al (2012). Informing listeners about the sex of the speaker reduced the discrepancy slightly, although this information did not lead to substantially improved age estimation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with findings reported by Amir et al (2012). Informing listeners about the sex of the speaker reduced the discrepancy slightly, although this information did not lead to substantially improved age estimation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One exception is a recent study by Amir et al (2012) who investigated age and gender recognition of a sample of Hebrew-speaking children between 8 and 18 years. Age recognition accuracy (±2 years) was fairly low (40% for sentences, 35% for isolated vowels) with the lowest performance for the oldest group where there was a tendency to systematically underestimate the perceived age in female voices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies (Hillenbrand and Clark, 2009;Assmann and Nearey 2011) have shown that listeners can identify the sex of the speaker more accurately from sentences than from single syllables. Amir et al (2012) found higher accuracy for the perception of age in children's voices based on complete sentences rather than isolated vowels, sustained tokens of /a/ and /i/. In the present study we compared hVd syllables spoken in isolation with those same syllables embedded in a carrier sentence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, few studies have examined children's voices. One exception is a recent study by Amir et al (2012) who found better than chance accuracy for age identification in a sample of speech (vowels and sentences) recorded from 120 children, including boys and girls from six age groups (ages 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18). Age recognition accuracy (defined in terms of age categories spanning 2 years) was fairly low (40% for sentences, 35% for vowels) with the lowest performance for the oldest group where there was a tendency to systematically underestimate the perceived age in female voices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation