2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of coherent groups of generators based on synchronization coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of a model, specific test scenarios are needed, and different models require different methods [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. To test the effectiveness of the designed model, the program was coded in Code Vision at the mechatronics lab of Rayan Shid Nama Eng.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of a model, specific test scenarios are needed, and different models require different methods [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. To test the effectiveness of the designed model, the program was coded in Code Vision at the mechatronics lab of Rayan Shid Nama Eng.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally, the correlation coefficient (CC) varies between -1.0 and +1.0 and measures the intensity and direction of the linear relationship that exists among the two quantities. About the power network, the variables represent the coherency of two different buses where a value of +1.0 indicates there is an ideal positive association among the two buses [28][29][30]. In order, to evaluate the degree of coherency between two different buses, the PPCC among bus i and j is formed as follows:…”
Section: Coherency Decttion Base On Pearson Product-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified RTBS system is employed to demonstrate the algorithm performance. The target is to have perfect reliability 1.00 based on (2). Table IV shows one iteration of the proposed model.…”
Section: Traditional Reliability Improvement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%