1995
DOI: 10.1121/1.412389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: A test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement

Abstract: The improvement of identification accuracy of concurrent vowels with differences in fundamental frequency (ΔF0) is usually attributed to mechanisms that exploit harmonic structure. To decide whether identification is aided primarily by selecting the target vowel on the basis of its harmonic structure (‘‘harmonic enhancement’’) or removing the interfering vowel on the basis of its harmonic structure (‘‘harmonic cancellation’’), pairs of synthetic vowels, each of which was either harmonic or inharmonic, were pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
56
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, on a practical level it can be very difficult to separate the actions of these two hypothetical observer strategies in actual experiments ͑however, cf. de Cheveigné et al, 1995͒. This is partly because, in masked conditions, both produce similar effects and both may result in selective/tuned responses along a given perceptual dimension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, on a practical level it can be very difficult to separate the actions of these two hypothetical observer strategies in actual experiments ͑however, cf. de Cheveigné et al, 1995͒. This is partly because, in masked conditions, both produce similar effects and both may result in selective/tuned responses along a given perceptual dimension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, given that simple tonal stimuli stream more readily at faster rates ͑van Noorden, 1975͒, two different rates of presentation are examined. Furthermore, the current work examines the effects of linking together target versus masker words and the implications of that comparison for the ability to selectively attend to one source or actively ignore a second source ͑see also de Cheveigné et al, 1995 andSimpson, 2007͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, using a large number of observations, we found no such interaction. Thus, it truly seems that pitch estimation does not help recognition based on timbre, at least for short durations and when there is no competing sound (de Cheveign e et al, 1995).…”
Section: Interim Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmonics of the same f 0 tend to fuse together to form a single percept with a pitch of f 0 . The perceptual fusion of harmonics can be used for segregating different sound sources (1)(2)(3) or to facilitate the discrimination of vocal communication sounds in noisy environments (4)(5)(6). Harmonicity is also an important principle in the context of music perception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%