2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00089-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates from sheep and goats by PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
63
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
63
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no amplification in the controls (Figure 5). The present of molecular diagnosis by using PCR for pld gene is agreement with previously studies (Cetinkaya, et al, 2002;Pacheco et al, 2006;Ali et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There was no amplification in the controls (Figure 5). The present of molecular diagnosis by using PCR for pld gene is agreement with previously studies (Cetinkaya, et al, 2002;Pacheco et al, 2006;Ali et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The IFN-γ ELISA test appears to be more sensitive than the normal antibody ELISA in detecting prior infection in goats, and it does not seem to be affected by vaccination in sheep [71]. Another novel strategy that holds promise for the diagnosis of CLA is the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests specific for C. pseudotuberculosis to identify bacteria isolated from abscesses [21].…”
Section: Diagnosis and Control Of Clamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested there may be a close genotypic relationship between C. pseudotuberculosis isolates of small ruminant origin from different regions of the world, given the disease spread following new migrations and sheep exports to Australia and the United States (Baird and Fontaine 2007). However, disease spread is reported to be lower than disease prevalence in many countries, where it is stated at 8-90% (Erganis et al 1990;Cetinkaya et al 2002;Al-Gaabary et al 2009;Guimaraes et al 2009;Seyffert et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%