2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/955/1/012021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of current-carrying part of a random resistor network: electrical approaches vs. graph theory algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1c) and the effective current I eff flowing through the electrode. We define the conduction network (also denoted as 'electrical backbone', 16,20 'current carrying backbone', 15 or 'current carrying path' 7,21 in the literature) as the set of resistor elements actually carrying electric current. Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Realizations and Macroscopic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1c) and the effective current I eff flowing through the electrode. We define the conduction network (also denoted as 'electrical backbone', 16,20 'current carrying backbone', 15 or 'current carrying path' 7,21 in the literature) as the set of resistor elements actually carrying electric current. Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Realizations and Macroscopic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Additional inhomogeneities are detectable at local scales, 11 in the order of NW length (tens of micrometers) or lower (NW diameter or NW junction size). Analytical 8,[12][13][14][15][16] and computational 8,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] modeling strategies are commonly used to interpret and predict the response of NW electrodes. Modeling studies confirm that only a subset of the NWs, which is traditionally referred to as the conduction network, is involved in the electrical conduction process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[For a review of different algorithms intended for backbone identification, see Ref. 58.] At the next stage, an adjacency matrix was formed for the geometrical backbone.…”
Section: Discrete Approach (Model I)mentioning
confidence: 99%