2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00028-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of cutter offset in end milling without a prior knowledge of cutting coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference, between static and dynamic tool runout, can be attributed to the non-inclusion, in static measurements, of several aspects affecting tool runout, such as uneven tooth spacing or dynamic effects. The same observation was reported by Wang and Zheng [5].…”
Section: Experimental and Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This difference, between static and dynamic tool runout, can be attributed to the non-inclusion, in static measurements, of several aspects affecting tool runout, such as uneven tooth spacing or dynamic effects. The same observation was reported by Wang and Zheng [5].…”
Section: Experimental and Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other researchers have studied how tool runout affects cutting geometry in end milling [3] proposing equations to calculate chip thickness in the case of tool runout. The identification of simple eccentricity, produced when tool has a different rotation axis than the geometric axis, was studied by Liang and Wang,and Wang and Zheng [4,5] while Seethaler and Yellowley [6] focused * Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Ranganath and Sutherland, 2002) developed a model for predicting tool radii and cutting forces in end milling, which included tool grinding errors, parallel axis offset and tilt. (Wang and Zheng, 2003) reported an analytical method to identify the 'offset geometry' in end milling from the measurements of the end milling force. For end milling (Ryu et al, 2006) obtained surface topographies in end milling considering errors produced not only by tool runout, tool eccentricity and tilt, but also tool deflection caused by cutting forces and back cutting of teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%