2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03031009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of differentially expressed genes involved in spine formation on seeds ofDaucus carota L. (carrot), using annealing control primer (ACP) system

Abstract: Carrot seeds normally have surface spines. The availability of a spineless mutant would be agronomically beneficial, eliminating the current efforts to remove those spines pre-sowing. Furthermore, the identification of spine-specific genes would provide insights into spine development in wild-type carrot seed. This effort could be facilitated through the use of an annealing control primer (ACP) system. Here, we employed a new and accurate reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) that involves AC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ACP systems have been widely used in differential gene expression studies since the development of improved systems and commercially available kits (Kim et al 2004 ). Although more studies have been reported for animals, the ACP differential display has been successfully used for identification of genes involved in spine formation on seeds of carrots (Park et al 2006 ), Cd-responsive genes in Solanum nigrum (Xu et al 2009 ), drought induced genes in barley (Lee et al 2011 ) and induced genes in cotton after inoculation with Aspergillus flavus (Lee et al 2012 ). We found ACP-based differential display more advantageous than cDNA-AFLP because of its methodological simplicity, due to the use of agarose gels instead of long AFLP polyacrylamide gels and due to obtaining much longer TDFs with good matches to known sequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACP systems have been widely used in differential gene expression studies since the development of improved systems and commercially available kits (Kim et al 2004 ). Although more studies have been reported for animals, the ACP differential display has been successfully used for identification of genes involved in spine formation on seeds of carrots (Park et al 2006 ), Cd-responsive genes in Solanum nigrum (Xu et al 2009 ), drought induced genes in barley (Lee et al 2011 ) and induced genes in cotton after inoculation with Aspergillus flavus (Lee et al 2012 ). We found ACP-based differential display more advantageous than cDNA-AFLP because of its methodological simplicity, due to the use of agarose gels instead of long AFLP polyacrylamide gels and due to obtaining much longer TDFs with good matches to known sequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like all differential display techniques, the GeneFishing method can be expected to reveal a subset of expression differences; and may be biased towards more abundant transcripts. Although relatively new, it has already been applied to studies of animal neurophysiology [ 10 ], cancer [ 11 ] and plant allellopathy [ 12 ] and development [ 13 ]. So far a quantitative evaluation of the technique compared with others such as cDNA-AFLP, RAPD-differential display, or microarray analysis has not been carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this method has a high reproducibility rate and eliminates false-positive results. The ACP system has been widely used for studies of cell differentiation during animal and plant development (Park et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2011). In the present study, ACP was used to identify potential genes related to the pistillody trait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%