2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of DNA-binding proteins using support vector machines and evolutionary profiles

Abstract: Background: Identification of DNA-binding proteins is one of the major challenges in the field of genome annotation, as these proteins play a crucial role in gene-regulation. In this paper, we developed various SVM modules for predicting DNA-binding domains and proteins. All models were trained and tested on multiple datasets of non-redundant proteins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
241
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
241
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was contrary to previously reported fact that dipeptide and four-part amino acid composition achieve better accuracy due to greater information content (Bhasin and Raghava, 2004a;Bhasin and Raghava, 2004b;Garg et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2006). Similar trend in MCC was also reported with DNA-binding protein prediction method developed by our group (Kumar et al, 2007b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was contrary to previously reported fact that dipeptide and four-part amino acid composition achieve better accuracy due to greater information content (Bhasin and Raghava, 2004a;Bhasin and Raghava, 2004b;Garg et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2006). Similar trend in MCC was also reported with DNA-binding protein prediction method developed by our group (Kumar et al, 2007b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In proteins, the number of amino acids (L) is not the same; hence we can not use PSI-BLAST PSSM directly to train SVM. In order to convert variable size L Â 21 dimension PSSM into fixed size 400 dimension input vector (PSSM-400) strategy used in DNA-binding proteins prediction method DNA binder was adopted (Kumar et al, 2007b). In short it was done in following steps: (a) all values of PSSM were normalized in range of 0-1 using formula (Value-minimum)/(maximum-minimum); (b) All rows belonging to the same amino acid were pooled together to form 20 matrices of size N AA Â 20, where N AA is the number of amino acid of type AA; (c) the summation of each column in new matrices (each daughter matrix) will produce a 20 dimensional vector.…”
Section: Evolutionary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MHC molecules have been well characterized in terms of their role in immune reactions. They bind to several peptide fragments generated after proteolytic cleavage of antigen [3]. This binding act like red flags for specific antigen and generates immune response against the parent antigen.…”
Section: Mhc Class Binding Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MHC molecules have been well characterized in terms of their role in immune reactions. They bind to some of the peptide fragments generated after proteolytic cleavage of antigen [8]. This binding acts like red flags for antigen specific and to generate immune response against the parent antigen.…”
Section: Mhc Class Binding Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%