2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of drought-tolerant pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) genotypes associated with certain fruit characteristics, seed yield, and quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drought stress leads the reduction in pumpkin plant height, leaf numbers, seed and fruit weight, seed number, width, and diameter [21,22]. In addition, it has a negative effect on physiological characteristics (e.g., antioxidant enzymes, pumpkin oil components, soluble protein content and photosynthetic pigments) [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought stress leads the reduction in pumpkin plant height, leaf numbers, seed and fruit weight, seed number, width, and diameter [21,22]. In addition, it has a negative effect on physiological characteristics (e.g., antioxidant enzymes, pumpkin oil components, soluble protein content and photosynthetic pigments) [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought tolerance is defined as the relative yield of a genotype compared to other genotypes subjected to the same drought stress [ 12 ]. Although yield was the primary characteristic for measurement of drought resistance on water deficit condition in many crops [ 13 15 ], the secondary characteristic might be specifically appropriate to improve selection response to drought stress condition. Relative water content, chlorophyll content, and ascorbic acid could be used as secondary indicators for selecting drought-tolerant genotypes [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and it had a rate of 72.82%. It has been reported that PCA analyzes were used in different studies and the study was strongly explained by PCA (Kamrani et al, 2018;Mozafari et a, 2019;Seymen et al, 2019;Yavuz et al, 2020;Seymen, 2021). As a result of PCA, the first component (PC1) explained 47.41% of the study, and the SY, TSW, SL, SW and ST were the most positively explained parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%