Iccas 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccas.2010.5670148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of dynamic parameters of an industrial robot using a recursively-optimized trajectory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volume 37 • Number 4 • 2017 • 490 -498 When collecting the torque values, we rotate Joint 1 at uniform speed, which makes both 3 k 2 and 3 k 33 to become zero. At the same time, we rotate Joints 2 and 3 according to a Fourier series excitation trajectory (Gu et al, 2010;Swevers et al, 2007). We constrain the joint angles, the velocities and the accelerations of Joints 1 and 3 to avoid self-collision.…”
Section: Assembly Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Volume 37 • Number 4 • 2017 • 490 -498 When collecting the torque values, we rotate Joint 1 at uniform speed, which makes both 3 k 2 and 3 k 33 to become zero. At the same time, we rotate Joints 2 and 3 according to a Fourier series excitation trajectory (Gu et al, 2010;Swevers et al, 2007). We constrain the joint angles, the velocities and the accelerations of Joints 1 and 3 to avoid self-collision.…”
Section: Assembly Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter values from accurate CAD are theoretical results which could be quite different from ground-truth values, as they depend a lot on the manufacturing and assembling processes. Directly using the parameter values obtained from CAD data leads to significant errors in control (Gu et al, 2010). To avoid this problem, engineers use physical experiments to perform dynamic parameter identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method has very strict requirement for robot dynamics. About dynamics parameters, there are disassembly measurement method, CAD method and overall identification method [10][11][12]. The most commonly used is parameter identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are generally six distinct types of parameter identification methods for robot link dynamics model. The most common approach is inverse dynamic identification model (IDIM) with ordinary least-squares method (Jin and Gans, 2015; Urrea and Pascal, 2021), and its variants including weighted least-squares (Gu et al , 2010; Liu et al , 2020), total least-squares (Briot and Gautier, 2015) and iteratively reweighted least-squares methods (Han et al , 2020). IDIM with instrumental variables method (Janot et al , 2014a, 2014b; Brunot et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach is inverse dynamic identification model (IDIM) with ordinary least-squares method (Jin and Gans, 2015; Urrea and Pascal, 2021), and its variants including weighted least-squares (Gu et al , 2010; Liu et al , 2020), total least-squares (Briot and Gautier, 2015) and iteratively reweighted least-squares methods (Han et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%