2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of dynamic systems using Piecewise-Affine basis function models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure is also applied in [27] for another CPWL model. Using similar definitions, one can get the "derivative" to establish gradient-based method for (5).…”
Section: Estimation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure is also applied in [27] for another CPWL model. Using similar definitions, one can get the "derivative" to establish gradient-based method for (5).…”
Section: Estimation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[9], a series of CPWL models, hinging hyperplanes, high-level canonical piecewise linear representation, generalized hinging hyperplanes are given by [1,15,26], respectively. Some identification algorithms are proposed, such as [11,17,18,27,28]. Along with this progress, CPWL functions have been wildly analyzed and applied for control and optimization, see [4,6,14,25,29] and etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem consists in building mathematical models of hybrid systems from observed input-output data. The PWARX models have attracted a considerable attention in recent years, since they provide an efficient solution for modeling a wide range of engineering applications (Roll et al 2004;Nakada et al 2005;Wen et al 2007;Xu et al 2012). In addition, these models are able to approximate any nonlinear system with arbitrary accuracy (Lin and Unbehauen 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Nonlinear system identification) The following system, firstly proposed by Narendra and Parthasarathy (1990) for neural networks identification, is considered a benchmark for black-box identification technique evaluation (Verdult et al, 2002;Nie, 1994;Boukhris et al, 1999;Wen et al, 2007):…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%