2023
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Early Biochemical Recurrence Predictors in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Takanobu Utsumi,
Hiroyoshi Suzuki,
Hitoshi Ishikawa
et al.

Abstract: The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical predictors of early biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A total of 670 high-risk PCa patients treated with CIRT and ADT were included in the study. Early BCR was defined as recurrence occurring during adjuvant ADT after CIRT or within 2 years after completion of ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to ident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the group with iPSA 20-50 ng/mL was not significantly different from the iPSA less than 20 ng/mL group, which may partly be a reason why the iPSA level could not incorporated as a VHR factor, because previous outcome analyses for VHR were conducted on results from surgical procedures which may exclude an uhPSA of ≥100 ng/mL. Accordingly, some authors have proposed that the uhPSA group is not a good candidate for local therapy and instead is a candidate for systemic therapy, partly because elevated PSA levels imply the existence of disease outside the prostate [16][17][18]. Our data partially concur with this opinion, because the uhPSA group showed increased PSA failure with more distant metastases, but not elevated local failure nor pelvic lymph node recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the group with iPSA 20-50 ng/mL was not significantly different from the iPSA less than 20 ng/mL group, which may partly be a reason why the iPSA level could not incorporated as a VHR factor, because previous outcome analyses for VHR were conducted on results from surgical procedures which may exclude an uhPSA of ≥100 ng/mL. Accordingly, some authors have proposed that the uhPSA group is not a good candidate for local therapy and instead is a candidate for systemic therapy, partly because elevated PSA levels imply the existence of disease outside the prostate [16][17][18]. Our data partially concur with this opinion, because the uhPSA group showed increased PSA failure with more distant metastases, but not elevated local failure nor pelvic lymph node recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%