2018
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsy043
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of epistasis loci underlying rice flowering time by controlling population stratification and polygenic effect

Abstract: Flowering time is an important agronomic trait, attributed by multiple genes, gene–gene interactions and environmental factors. Population stratification and polygenic effects might confound genetic effects of the causal loci underlying this complex trait. We proposed a two-step approach for detecting epistasis interactions underlying rice flowering time by accounting population structure and polygenic effects. Simulation studies showed that the approach used in this study performs better than classical and PC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(93 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our mapping results (main effect and epistatic) showed that both unique and common loci underlie FLT variation under long and short photoperiod ( Figure 1 ; Figures S4–S8 ). Epistatic loci underlie FLT in both selfing (Komeda, 2004; Juenger et al, 2005; Huang et al, 2013; Chen et al, 2018b; Li et al, 2018a; Mathew et al, 2018) and outcrossing (Buckler et al, 2009; Durand et al, 2012) species. In addition, the effect size of FLT loci differs between selfing and out crossing species as QTL effect sizes are large in the former (Lin et al, 1995; Maurer et al, 2015) and small in the later (Buckler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our mapping results (main effect and epistatic) showed that both unique and common loci underlie FLT variation under long and short photoperiod ( Figure 1 ; Figures S4–S8 ). Epistatic loci underlie FLT in both selfing (Komeda, 2004; Juenger et al, 2005; Huang et al, 2013; Chen et al, 2018b; Li et al, 2018a; Mathew et al, 2018) and outcrossing (Buckler et al, 2009; Durand et al, 2012) species. In addition, the effect size of FLT loci differs between selfing and out crossing species as QTL effect sizes are large in the former (Lin et al, 1995; Maurer et al, 2015) and small in the later (Buckler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint effect of alleles at these loci may be lower or higher than the total effects of the loci (Johnson, 2008). In selfing species, epistasis is common due to high level of homozygosity (Volis et al, 2010) and epistatic interactions have been found among loci underlying flowering time in barley (Mathew et al, 2018), rice (Chen et al, 2015; Chen et al, 2018b), and sorghum (Li et al, 2018a). Although, theoretical models and empirical studies involving simulations have suggested the significant role for epistasis in breeding (Melchinger et al, 2007; Volis et al, 2010; Messina et al, 2011; Howard et al, 2014), empirical evidence from practical breeding are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, three candidate genes including Nsn1, Fpa, and Zmm22 were identified in 942 maize samples (Zea mays) [21]; two candidate genes, CO1 and BFL, were identified in using 218 barley samples (Hordeum vulgare) [22]; eight candidate genes including Hd1 were confirmed in 950 rice samples (Oryza sativa) [23]; and ten candidate genes including SOC1, AGL6, and ELF8 were reported in 309 soybean samples (Glycine max) [13]. These findings have presented valuable information to various breeding programs focused on DTF, but have a limitation to further improve DTF, because they are not sufficient for explaining all of the phenotypic variations in DTF such as interaction effects between markers [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Epistasis is defined as the interaction between genes or SNP markers that influences a trait [25]. Each SNP marker above a significant level in GWAS has a strong effect on the determination of a trait, but non-significant markers that interact with each other could also have a large influence on the trait [24]. Therefore, considering epistatic interactions for multi-variant nonadditive effects, enables to discover more markers associated with traits, together with GWAS on single-variant-additive-effects [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area of quantitative genetics, it is well known that complex traits are controlled by multiple genes, epistasis, and gene-environment interactions [9][10][11]. Therefore, multiple genetic variants 3 and environmental modulators may control BSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%