2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of female carriers for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies using a FISH-based approach

Abstract: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are X-linked recessive neuromuscular diseases caused by dystrophin gene mutations. Deletions, or more rarely duplications, of single or multiple exons within the dystrophin gene can be detected by current molecular methods in approximately 65% of DMD patients. Mothers of affected males have a two-thirds chance of carrying a dystrophin mutation, whilst approximately one-third of affected males have de novo mutations. Currently, Southern blot … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above described PCR approach is not useful in detecting female carriers in whom deletions are masked by the amplification of the normal X chromosome. Thus, identification of female carriers must be carried out by different strategies, such as linkage analysis with intragenic polymorphic markers (Darras et al 1987;Clemens et al 1991), quantitative analysis of gene dosage (Prior et al 1990;Abbs and Bobrow 1993) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis (Voskova-Goldman et al 1997;Ligon et al 2000). However, linkage analysis cannot be used in families with a single affected male or performed if DNA of the affected members of the family is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The above described PCR approach is not useful in detecting female carriers in whom deletions are masked by the amplification of the normal X chromosome. Thus, identification of female carriers must be carried out by different strategies, such as linkage analysis with intragenic polymorphic markers (Darras et al 1987;Clemens et al 1991), quantitative analysis of gene dosage (Prior et al 1990;Abbs and Bobrow 1993) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis (Voskova-Goldman et al 1997;Ligon et al 2000). However, linkage analysis cannot be used in families with a single affected male or performed if DNA of the affected members of the family is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, while confirming the results of other groups, FISH using DMD exon-specific probes represents an effective, highly accurate, direct, qualitative approach for establishing DMD carrier status of females (Ligon et al, 2000;Hermanova et al, 2002). Even when there is no cure for DMD patients, providing an accurate diagnosis for female carriers allows bringing the family to a precise genetic counseling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These molecular tools are very useful for detecting DMD gene deletions in males, but for females the detection of deletions can be problematic since women possess two X chromosomes (Ligon et al, 2000). More recently, FISH detecting chromosomal deletions has been introduced to identify specific DMD exon deletions (Voskova-Goldman et al, 1997;Ligon et al, 2000;Hermanova et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above described PCR approach is unable to detect either duplications or female carriers in whom deletions are masked by the amplification of the normal X chromosome. Thus, identification of female carriers requires different strategies, such as segregation analysis with intragenic polymorphic markers (Darras et al, 1987;Clemens et al, 1991), quantitative analysis of gene dosage (Prior et al, 1990;Abbs and Bobrow, 1993) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (Voskova-Goldman et al, 1997;Ligon et al, 2000). However, segregation analysis cannot be used in families with a single affected male or performed if DNA of the affected members of the family is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%