2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2008.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of fly eggs using scanning electron microscopy for forensic investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the immature stages pose a great identification challenge for forensic entomologists due to their lack of species-specific anatomical characters (McDonagh et al 2009). Identification of these stages using traditional methods (Mendonca et al 2008) and/ or advanced techniques (McDonagh et al 2009) is therefore the focus of many forensic studies. The most popular method of identification in recent years includes molecular taxonomy (Harvey et al 2003; Smith and Baker 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the immature stages pose a great identification challenge for forensic entomologists due to their lack of species-specific anatomical characters (McDonagh et al 2009). Identification of these stages using traditional methods (Mendonca et al 2008) and/ or advanced techniques (McDonagh et al 2009) is therefore the focus of many forensic studies. The most popular method of identification in recent years includes molecular taxonomy (Harvey et al 2003; Smith and Baker 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chorion of the egg shell in many insects bears more or less hexagonal honey-comb impressions of the follicular cells (epithelium) of the female ovaries (Mendonca et al 2008). Similar observations on chorion sculpture as reflection of the follicular cell morphology were also made by Ubero-Pascal and Puig (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, some of the published descriptions should be used with caution, as divergent information has been provided by independent authors. Such discrepancies can be found in descriptions of the egg morphology of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) provided by Sukontason et al (2007) and Mendonça et al (2008). According to Sukontason et al (2007) in L. cuprina the plastron covers almost the entire egg length, whereas Mendonça et al (2008) for the same species described the plastron only in the anterior third of the dorsal surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such discrepancies can be found in descriptions of the egg morphology of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) provided by Sukontason et al (2007) and Mendonça et al (2008). According to Sukontason et al (2007) in L. cuprina the plastron covers almost the entire egg length, whereas Mendonça et al (2008) for the same species described the plastron only in the anterior third of the dorsal surface. Greenberg and Singh (1995) stated that egg morphology of L. sericata (Meigen), L. illustris (Meigen), L. cuprina, and L. coeruleiviridis Macquart (all as Phaenicia Robineau‐Desvoidy) is very similar and can cause difficulties in species identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation