2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0275-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of genes associated with methotrexate resistance in methotrexate-resistant osteosarcoma cell lines

Abstract: BackgroundThis study aimed to better understand the mechanisms underlying methotrexate (MTX)—resistance in osteosarcoma.MethodsThe raw transcription microarray data GSE16089 collected from three MTX-sensitive osteosarcoma (Saos-2) cell samples and three MTX-resistant osteosarcoma (Saos-2) cell samples were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus. After data processing, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Next, DEGs were submitted to DAVID for functional annotation based on the GO (Gene O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, the down-regulated DEGs of MTX-resistant osteosarcoma cell lines were enriched in the mitotic cell cycle, cell cycle, and DNA replication pathways, which were also down-regulated in our MTX-resistant colon cancer cells. This result might explain the role of MTX in inhibiting dihyrofolate reductase ( DHFR ) and preventing tumor cells from proliferating in both cases 38, 39 . In addition, down-regulated expression of MMR genes, which affects G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, might prevent proper checkpoint and cell-death signaling; therefore, this phenomenon could contribute to the malfunctioning of DNA replication 40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As previously reported, the down-regulated DEGs of MTX-resistant osteosarcoma cell lines were enriched in the mitotic cell cycle, cell cycle, and DNA replication pathways, which were also down-regulated in our MTX-resistant colon cancer cells. This result might explain the role of MTX in inhibiting dihyrofolate reductase ( DHFR ) and preventing tumor cells from proliferating in both cases 38, 39 . In addition, down-regulated expression of MMR genes, which affects G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, might prevent proper checkpoint and cell-death signaling; therefore, this phenomenon could contribute to the malfunctioning of DNA replication 40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Transactivation and upregulation of FPGS have been reported to promote the cytotoxicity of MTX in many cancer cell lines and vice versa. Treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDA-Cis) resulted in increased FPGS expression and higher intracellular accumulation of long-chain MTX-PG [3][4][5][6][7] in the relevant all models through epigenetic mechanisms involving histone modifications and chromatin remodelling and NFY-B-and Sp1-mediated recruitment of HDAC1 to the FPGS promoter [41]. Some fusion proteins, such as TEL-AML1 and E2A-PBX1, suppress FPGS transcription by recruiting co-repressors (mSin3A, Rb) and HDAC1 to the FPGS promoter region [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the mechanisms underlying MTX‐resistance remain largely unknown. Several mechanistic investigations have been carried out based on in vitro systems using drug‐induced MTX‐resistant OS cell lines, which are cell lines with acquired MDR and thus do not faithfully reflect mechanisms underlying de novo MTX‐resistance in OS patients .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, YM-155 mediated a loss of many of these processes including CCNB1 [-2.5, p<0.001] and CCNB2 [-2.77, p<0.001] (which encodes G2/mitotic-specific cyclin-B 1 and 2 proteins) cyclin B/CDK1, BORA, AURKB, CENPA, CCNE2 and its target PLK1 [-2.41, p<0.001], all of which are essential for mitotic recovery after DNA damage (80)(81)(82)(83)(84)(85). Many of these cycle checkpoint transcripts are reportedly overexpressed in aggressive chemo resistant tumors (86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91) leading to unbridled proliferation (92), poor prognosis (93) to which small-molecule inhibitors that target these kinases are currently being tested as anticancer drugs (94)(95)(96). Kinase inhibition would indirectly prevent Plk1 activation, initiate G2 arrest (97), trigger a simultaneous rise in tumor suppressors-p53-inducible p21 tumor, Wee1, Myt1, p21 (98), as well as proteasomal Bcl-2 degradation (99) all contributing to cytostatic mediated apoptosis (100)(101)(102)(103)(104)(105)(106)(107).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%