2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00254.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of genes in cassava that are differentially expressed during infection with Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis

Abstract: SUMMARY The cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism approach was used to identify differentially expressed transcripts from cassava infected by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis (Xam). Approximately 3600 transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were screened of which 340 were isolated. The nucleotide sequences of 250 TDFs were analysed and assembled into contigs and singletons. The amino acid sequences of their predicted products were compared with entries in databases and 63 of these clones showed homology … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of cDNA-AFLP has been described as an extremely efficient, reproducible and sensitive method for isolation of differentially expressed genes (Bachem et al, 1996;Cooper, 2001). cDNA-AFLP was used to identify cassava genes expressed during infection with Xam by comparing the differential gene expression of a compatible (susceptible plant) and incompatible (resistant plant) reaction over time (Santaella et al, 2004). Transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were selected when their expression was up-regulated during the bacterial infection in the resistant variety.…”
Section: Gene Expression Analysis By Transcript Profiling and Ests Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cDNA-AFLP has been described as an extremely efficient, reproducible and sensitive method for isolation of differentially expressed genes (Bachem et al, 1996;Cooper, 2001). cDNA-AFLP was used to identify cassava genes expressed during infection with Xam by comparing the differential gene expression of a compatible (susceptible plant) and incompatible (resistant plant) reaction over time (Santaella et al, 2004). Transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were selected when their expression was up-regulated during the bacterial infection in the resistant variety.…”
Section: Gene Expression Analysis By Transcript Profiling and Ests Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic approaches demonstrated the induction of a high number of defence related genes in challenged cassava cell cultures with 26% of genes encoding for PR-or stress related proteins or in inoculated cassava plants with 13% of analysed transcript-derived fragments showing similarity to plant defence proteins (Santaella et al, 2004). Among biochemical mechanisms, the oxidative burst, phenylpropanoids, phenylalanin ammonia lyase and peroxidases were suggested to be involved in the resistance reaction of cassava (Beeching et al, 1998, Gomez-Vasquez et al, 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic approaches demonstrated the induction of a high number of defence related genes in challenged cassava cell cultures with 26% of genes encoding for PR-or stress related proteins [101] or in inoculated cassava plants with 13% of analyzed transcript-derived fragments showing similarity to plant defense proteins [102]. Among biochemical mechanisms, the oxidative burst, phenylpropanoids, phenylalanin ammonia lyase and peroxidases were suggested to be involved in the resistance reaction of cassava [103,104].…”
Section: Resistance Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%