2011
DOI: 10.5808/gi.2011.9.2.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Genomic Differences between Hanwoo and Holstein Breeds Using the Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip

Abstract: The use of genomic information in genomic selection programs for dairy and beef cattle breeds has become a reality in recent years. In this investigation, we analyzed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for Hanwoo (n=50) and Holstein (n=50) breeds using the Illumina Bovine SNP50 BeadChip to facilitate genomic selection and utilization of the Hanwoo breed in Korea. Analysis of the entire genomes showed different spectra of SNP frequencies for Hanwoo and Holstein cattle. The study revealed a highly significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall MAF in the present finding for indigenous Ethiopian cattle breeds is higher than an earlier report for indicine breeds but lower than the average value reported for most taurine breeds [ 3 ]. The value found for Hanwoo cattle was comparable with the previous results for taurine breeds but higher than the reported average for the same breed [ 10 , 12 ]. This could be attributed to the different marker density used, and a higher density marker (Illumina Bovine 50K SNP BeadChip) was used in the previous study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall MAF in the present finding for indigenous Ethiopian cattle breeds is higher than an earlier report for indicine breeds but lower than the average value reported for most taurine breeds [ 3 ]. The value found for Hanwoo cattle was comparable with the previous results for taurine breeds but higher than the reported average for the same breed [ 10 , 12 ]. This could be attributed to the different marker density used, and a higher density marker (Illumina Bovine 50K SNP BeadChip) was used in the previous study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The distribution of MAFs revealed that nearly 34.08% of the markers in Ethiopian cattle populations and 53% in Hanwoo cattle displayed a high degree of polymorphisms (0.3 ≤ MAF ≤ 0.5). Yet, this value was higher than an earlier report both for Hanwoo (25%) and Holstein (28%) [ 12 ]. Much higher MAFs were detected in Bos taurus breeds than in Bos indicus breeds [ 3 ].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…For each breed, 50 samples were collected and DNA was extracted according to the laboratory procedure. Technical details of the experiment were previously described by Melka et al (2011) . Additionally, the available SNPs frequency data of Charolais, Angus, Simmental and Limousine breeds were obtained from Decker et al (2009) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to increasing interest in the genomic selection of cattle based on SNP arrays (especially BovineSNP50 BeadChip, Illumina) there is a huge amount of genomic information concerning the most popular cattle breeds (HARRIS et al 2008;HAYES et al 2009). However, there is only limited information about the performance of currently available genomic tools in native or rare cattle breeds (MATUKUMALLI et al 2009;MELKA et al 2011). Despite the fact that genomic selection does not concern preserved cattle breeds, with low population sizes, these breeds may be the subject of population genetics and phylogenetic studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%