2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12052488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Geriatric Depression and Anxiety Using Activity Tracking Data and Minimal Geriatric Assessment Scales

Abstract: The identification of geriatric depression and anxiety is important because such conditions are the most common comorbid mood problems that occur in older adults. The goal of this study was to build a machine learning framework that identifies geriatric mood disorders of depression and anxiety using low-cost activity trackers and minimal geriatric assessment scales. We collected activity tracking data from 352 mild cognitive impairment patients, from 60 to 90 in age, by having them wear activity trackers on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study extends our previous work 11 by applying a DL approach to identify geriatric depression and anxiety using activity tracking and sleep data. A multi-label DL model is applied to handle comorbid depression and anxiety problems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study extends our previous work 11 by applying a DL approach to identify geriatric depression and anxiety using activity tracking and sleep data. A multi-label DL model is applied to handle comorbid depression and anxiety problems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The dataset used in this study was obtained from a previous study 11 undertaken by Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital from May 2017 to May 2019. At that time, all participants provided written informed consent, and the research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital (EUMC 2016‐09‐042‐013).…”
Section: Sample Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations