1990
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1091343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Hearing Impairment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Population: Outcome of a Five-Year Project at The Johns Hopkins Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Once an infant is discharged from the newborn nursery or neonatal intensive care unit, there is a strong likelihood that the infant will fail to meet outpatient appointments for follow-up care. Schimizu et al 11 reported that more than one-third of college-educated mothers failed to return their children for scheduled appointments, and more than two-thirds of mothers with a ninth grade education failed to do so. 11 This is the reason that screening before discharge is strongly recommended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Once an infant is discharged from the newborn nursery or neonatal intensive care unit, there is a strong likelihood that the infant will fail to meet outpatient appointments for follow-up care. Schimizu et al 11 reported that more than one-third of college-educated mothers failed to return their children for scheduled appointments, and more than two-thirds of mothers with a ninth grade education failed to do so. 11 This is the reason that screening before discharge is strongly recommended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schimizu et al 11 reported that more than one-third of college-educated mothers failed to return their children for scheduled appointments, and more than two-thirds of mothers with a ninth grade education failed to do so. 11 This is the reason that screening before discharge is strongly recommended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the three basic approaches currently employed in neonatal hearing screening, objective methods, in particular those employing auditory brain stem response methods (ABR), have also proven to be the most cost effective. 14,15 While the case history analysis-High Risk Register or Questionnaire-can identify 50 to 75 percent of hearing impaired infants, 3,10 many infants who eventually are found to have severe hearing impairment may not be identified by this approach. 16 Indeed, Stein and colleagues have observed that only one out of every three hearing impaired infants is identified via screening programs confined to high risk infants, in this case those requiring admission to a NICU.…”
Section: Advances In Screening Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision represents an advancement in infant hearing health, for it will provide the outlining of early identifi cation and intervention services for hearing health at the national level. However, part of the newborns will continue with no access to specialized assistance, owing to secondary factors such as families ' adherence to the program and the possibility of later or progressive hearing loss (Shimizu et al, 1990;Carney & Moeller, 1998;Melo, 2008). Therefore, the need to develop other strategies related to infant hearing health is evident.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%