2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Hepatotropic Viruses from Plasma Using Deep Sequencing: A Next Generation Diagnostic Tool

Abstract: We conducted an unbiased metagenomics survey using plasma from patients with chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and patients without liver disease (control). RNA and DNA libraries were sequenced from plasma filtrates enriched in viral particles to catalog virus populations. Hepatitis viruses were readily detected at high coverage in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B and C, but only a limited number of sequences resembling other viru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, libraries made from comparable non-subtype B Cameroonian specimens with viral loads of Ն4.5 log 10 prepared by RdA/RdB random priming (37-39) yielded a median of 0.14% Ϯ 0.8% HIV-1 reads, whereas those prepared by HIV-SMART virus-specific priming yielded a median of 2.48% Ϯ 2.33% HIV-1 reads, for a Ͼ17-fold increase in viral reads (15). The HIV-SMART approach is also an improvement relative to published methods; one reported Յ311 viral reads for numerous high-titer (5 to 6 log 10 copies/ml) HIV specimens, and another which started with a larger volume of specimen (4 to 8 ml of plasma) yielded incomplete coverage and 0.007 to 1.44% viral reads (24,40). Our results with the optimized HIV-SMART protocol (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, libraries made from comparable non-subtype B Cameroonian specimens with viral loads of Ն4.5 log 10 prepared by RdA/RdB random priming (37-39) yielded a median of 0.14% Ϯ 0.8% HIV-1 reads, whereas those prepared by HIV-SMART virus-specific priming yielded a median of 2.48% Ϯ 2.33% HIV-1 reads, for a Ͼ17-fold increase in viral reads (15). The HIV-SMART approach is also an improvement relative to published methods; one reported Յ311 viral reads for numerous high-titer (5 to 6 log 10 copies/ml) HIV specimens, and another which started with a larger volume of specimen (4 to 8 ml of plasma) yielded incomplete coverage and 0.007 to 1.44% viral reads (24,40). Our results with the optimized HIV-SMART protocol (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We optimized the protocol for this purpose and found that the addition of benzonase prior to extraction increased HIV-1 reads (ϳ10-to 50-fold) and genome coverage (from 28% to 54%), presumably by decreasing human background nucleic acid, while a postextraction DNase treatment was often detrimental ( Fig. 3; see Table S2 in the supplemental material) (24,30). The selection of nucleic acid extraction method also drove performance, with higher HIV-1 RNA recovery correlating with higher genome coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To filter the reads that were of host origin, clean data were then blast against the host database using SoapAligner software (soap2.21, http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapaligner.html). The parameters were as follows: identity greater than or equal to 90%, ‐l 30, ‐v 7, ‐M 4, ‐m 200, ‐x 400 (Law et al., ). Then, the high‐quality reads of each sample were assembled by the SOAPdenovo software (V2.04, http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html) (Luo et al., ), with the parameters ‐d 1, ‐M 3, ‐R, ‐u, ‐F, ‐K 55 (Qin et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, these data indicate that amoebae-infecting viruses are likely to be common inhabitants of our biosphere. Recently, metagenomic reads matching the genomes of mimiviruses have been identified in various human samples, including faeces, respiratory samples and blood [32,][43,44,45,46,47,48] (fig. 2, 3).…”
Section: Metagenomic Serological and Epidemiological Findings Relatementioning
confidence: 99%