2016
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification ofIL11RAandMELKamplification in gastric cancer by comprehensive genomic profiling of gastric cancer cell lines

Abstract: AIMTo identify common copy number alterations on gastric cancer cell lines.METHODSFour gastric cancer cell lines (ACP02, ACP03, AGP01 and PG100) underwent chromosomal comparative genome hybridization and array comparative genome hybridization. We also confirmed the results by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using the bacterial artificial chromosome clone and quantitative real time PCR analysis.RESULTSThe amplification of 9p13.3 was detected in all cell lines by both methodologies. An increase in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a marked increase of MELK expression was detected in tumors associated with shorter survival length of the patients, thus underlining a role of MELK also in iCCA biological aggressiveness and the patient's prognosis. In agreement with our data, high levels of MELK have been previously shown to directly correlate with an unfavorable outcome in various cancer entities [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Therefore, overall the present findings strongly support an important pathogenetic and prognostic role of MELK in human iCCA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a marked increase of MELK expression was detected in tumors associated with shorter survival length of the patients, thus underlining a role of MELK also in iCCA biological aggressiveness and the patient's prognosis. In agreement with our data, high levels of MELK have been previously shown to directly correlate with an unfavorable outcome in various cancer entities [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Therefore, overall the present findings strongly support an important pathogenetic and prognostic role of MELK in human iCCA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…MELK may also play a key role in tumor resistance to therapies and DNA repair, as MELK inhibition significantly increases the sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in various models [16,17]. Thus, it is not surprising that high levels of MELK are detected in many solid tumors and in leukemia, where increased MELK expression correlates with poor prognosis and aggressiveness [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Genomic and pharmacological inhibition of MELK has been shown to hamper tumor growth, both in vitro and in various preclinical tumor models, further suggesting that this kinase could be a potential therapeutic target in cancer [22,28,29,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes such as SYT13 [71] and BCYRN1 [72] were responsible for invasion and migration of many cancer cells such as gastric cancer and lung cancer, but these genes may be associated with invasion and migration of GBM cells. Overexpression of genes such as IL11RA [73], BST2 [74] and GAS6 [75] were important for pathogenesis of many cancer types such as gastric cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer, but high expression of these genes may be responsible for advancement of GBM. FERMT2 was responsible for proliferation of esophageal squamous cancer cells [76], but this gene may be linked with proliferation of GBM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, amplification was detected at 9p13.3, where the IL11RA gene is located. Some primary gastric adenocarcinoma samples (19.1%) were found to have an increased copy number of IL11RA [ 48 ]. Semaphorin 6D (SEMA6D) has been previously implicated in immune responses, heart development, and neurogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%