2004
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia complex, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in respiratory samples from cystic fibrosis patients using multiplex PCR

Abstract: A multiplex PCR method was developed to identify P. aeruginosa, B. cepacia complex, and S. maltophilia directly in sputum and oropharyngeal samples from CF patients. One hundred and six patients (53 male, and 53 female) attending our pulmonology clinic were studied from September 2000-April 2001. Two hundred and fifty-seven samples were cultured in selective media and submitted to multiplex PCR reactions, using three primer pairs targeting specific genomic sequences of each species, with an additional primer p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…PFGE, ERIC-PCR, gyrB restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, and ribotyping have been used to analyze S. maltophilia isolates recovered from sputum samples (45,57,63,78,222,246,287,338,364). Multiplex PCR has been used to identify S. maltophilia, P. aeruginosa, and B. cepacia complex isolates in respiratory samples from CF patients (71). Primers designed to amplify a 149-bp fragment of the chitinase A gene of S. maltophilia were included in a multiplex procedure with universal primers to detect 16S rRNA genes and primers specific for P. aeruginosa and 16S rRNA genes of the B. cepacia complex.…”
Section: S Maltophilia and The Cystic Fibrosis Lung Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PFGE, ERIC-PCR, gyrB restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, and ribotyping have been used to analyze S. maltophilia isolates recovered from sputum samples (45,57,63,78,222,246,287,338,364). Multiplex PCR has been used to identify S. maltophilia, P. aeruginosa, and B. cepacia complex isolates in respiratory samples from CF patients (71). Primers designed to amplify a 149-bp fragment of the chitinase A gene of S. maltophilia were included in a multiplex procedure with universal primers to detect 16S rRNA genes and primers specific for P. aeruginosa and 16S rRNA genes of the B. cepacia complex.…”
Section: S Maltophilia and The Cystic Fibrosis Lung Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multiplex protocol demonstrated high negative predictive values (Ͼ90%) for the identification of the three pathogens, in contrast to the relatively low positive predictive values. It was proposed that the genomic heterogeneity observed among S. maltophilia strains may provide a reason for the low sensitivity of the method for the detection of S. maltophilia (71).…”
Section: S Maltophilia and The Cystic Fibrosis Lung Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…maltophilia mainly causes nosocomial infections (48), although communityacquired infections can also occur (49). The population at risk is mostly composed of immunocompromised hosts, including intensive care unit (ICU) patients, patients with dialysis catheters, hematological diseases, and cystic fibrosis, and those treated with a wide spectrum of antibiotics (50)(51)(52)(53). Although our results indicate that vitK3 might induce the expression of the smeVWX efflux pump even at low concentrations and antagonizes the effects of ofloxacin and chloramphenicol against S. maltophilia, both in the presence and in the absence of this efflux pump, the clinical significance of these findings remains to be clearly established.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotypic identification of the 26 bacterial strains used in this work was performed by multiplex PCR using primers specific for S. maltophilia, the Burkholderia cepacia complex, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, plus a pair targeting a universal 16S RNA stretch as a positive control (6). The reactions were set up with 25-l aliquots using 2.5-l samples of exponential cultures without any processing as DNA sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%