2012
DOI: 10.5897/ajmr12.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of immunotolerance in the progeny of cows infected with Brucella abortus

Abstract: The progeny of cows infected with Brucella abortus could acquire the bacterium during their fetal stage and generate immune tolerance. In order to identify them, a clinical assay was conducted with two groups of seronegative calves. In Group I, seven bovine females received a standard S19 dose, and in Group II, eight males served as control. All animals were sampled seven times by official serological tests every 45 days. Also, complete blood with anticoagulant was collected and tested by the polymerase chain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antibodies produced in vaccination with a B19 sample, when performed up to the eighth month of life, disappear quickly and animals older than 24 months are negative in serological tests. In case the vaccine is performed in older animals, there is a great chance of interference of antibodies against the vaccine in the diagnostic tests (MARTÍNEZ-HERRERA et al, 2012). Although the use of the vaccine in males at risk of infecting them and developing the clinical form is prohibited, it may have occurred and the animals are false-positive since they are within the period where there is interference of vaccine antibodies (BRASIL, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibodies produced in vaccination with a B19 sample, when performed up to the eighth month of life, disappear quickly and animals older than 24 months are negative in serological tests. In case the vaccine is performed in older animals, there is a great chance of interference of antibodies against the vaccine in the diagnostic tests (MARTÍNEZ-HERRERA et al, 2012). Although the use of the vaccine in males at risk of infecting them and developing the clinical form is prohibited, it may have occurred and the animals are false-positive since they are within the period where there is interference of vaccine antibodies (BRASIL, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%