2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2021.114429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of in vitro JMJD lysine demethylase candidate substrates via systematic determination of substrate preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data represents the average of three luminescent readings and error bars represent the SEM (n=3). Data for KDM5A was previously published ( Hoekstra and Biggar, 2021 ). …”
Section: Step-by-step Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data represents the average of three luminescent readings and error bars represent the SEM (n=3). Data for KDM5A was previously published ( Hoekstra and Biggar, 2021 ). …”
Section: Step-by-step Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data represents the mean luminescence and standard deviation (n=3) normalized to the max signal. Data for KDM5A was previously published ( Hoekstra and Biggar, 2021 ). …”
Section: Step-by-step Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In turn, these candidate recognition motifs can then be used to score and prioritize the methyllysine proteome for candidate substrates. Figure for KDM5A was adapted from 124 . Reprinted with permission of Star Protocols -Cell Press.…”
Section: Timing: 1-2 Hoursmentioning
confidence: 99%