2002
DOI: 10.1053/crad.2002.1057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Inguinal Lymph Node Metastases from Vulval Carcinoma by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Initial Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the unreliability of the clinical assessment of groin node status, the main reason for radiologic imaging in vulval carcinoma is to assess nodal status. CT imaging and other imaging techniques such as MRI rely on size criteria to assess nodal positivity (16) . This is associated with reduced sensitivity and specificity as normal-sized nodes may contain metastases and enlarged nodes may be reactive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the unreliability of the clinical assessment of groin node status, the main reason for radiologic imaging in vulval carcinoma is to assess nodal status. CT imaging and other imaging techniques such as MRI rely on size criteria to assess nodal positivity (16) . This is associated with reduced sensitivity and specificity as normal-sized nodes may contain metastases and enlarged nodes may be reactive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sensitivity for both groups of inguinal nodes was low (respectively, 40% and 50%), which means a high false-negative rate (24) . Another pilot study showed a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 89% for detection of inguinal lymph node metastases by MRI in ten patients with vulvar carcinoma (25) . Prediction of lymph node metastases in vulvar cancer 965…”
Section: Ct and Mrimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hawnaur et al 70 and Sohaib et al 71 both highlighted the potential of using MRI to detect nodal involvement with high specificities of 91% to 100%, although the sensitivities ranged from 40% to 89%. In larger studies, Singh et al 72 also found MRI to be accurate in predicting negative nodal status, whereas Bipat et al 73 found no role for MRI in evaluating lymph node involvement, with high negative predictive values of 87% and 89% for 2 separate observers.…”
Section: Vulval Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%