Understanding students’ acoustic evaluation in learning environments is crucial for identifying acoustic issues, improving acoustic conditions, and enhancing academic performance. However, predictive models are not specifically tailored to predict students’ acoustic evaluations, particularly in educational settings. To bridge this gap, the present study conducted a field investigation in a university library, including a measurement and questionnaire survey. Using the collected personal information, room-related parameters, and sound pressure levels as input, six machine learning models (Support Vector Machine–Radial Basis Function (SVM (RBF)), Support Vector Machine–Sigmoid (SVM (Sigmoid)), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Naïve Bayes (NB)) were trained to predict students’ acoustic acceptance/satisfaction. The performance of these models was evaluated using five metrics, allowing for a comparative analysis. The results revealed that the models better predicted acoustic acceptance than acoustic satisfaction. Notably, the RF and GBM models exhibited the highest performance, with accuracies of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively, in predicting acoustic acceptance. Conversely, the SVM models performed poorly and were not recommended for acoustic quality prediction. The findings of this study demonstrated the feasibility of employing machine learning models to predict occupants’ acoustic evaluations, thereby providing valuable insights for future acoustic assessments.