2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018960108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of key factors that reduce the variability of the single photon response

Abstract: Rod photoreceptors mediate vision in dim light. Their biological function is to discriminate between distinct, very low levels of illumination, i.e., they serve as reliable photon counters. This role requires high reproducibility of the response to a particular number of photons. Indeed, single photon responses demonstrate unexpected low variability, despite the stochastic nature of the individual steps in the transduction cascade. We analyzed individual system mechanisms to identify their contribution to vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies in the early 1980s have demonstrated a lower sensitivity and slower kinetics of flash responses (3,17,18) at the tip of the OSs and that the amplitude of the single photon response is smaller at the OS tip than at the OS base (18). Despite these experimental observations, most of the models of phototransduction, developed subsequently, assumed a homogeneous efficacy of the transduction machinery along the OS (1,(19)(20)(21)(22). In the present paper, by using highly confined spots of light obtained with apertureless tapered optical fibers (TOFs), we reveal that the biochemical machinery inside the rod OS has a gradient of efficacy much larger than previously thought (17,18), demonstrating that the assumption of a homogeneous OS is not true.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies in the early 1980s have demonstrated a lower sensitivity and slower kinetics of flash responses (3,17,18) at the tip of the OSs and that the amplitude of the single photon response is smaller at the OS tip than at the OS base (18). Despite these experimental observations, most of the models of phototransduction, developed subsequently, assumed a homogeneous efficacy of the transduction machinery along the OS (1,(19)(20)(21)(22). In the present paper, by using highly confined spots of light obtained with apertureless tapered optical fibers (TOFs), we reveal that the biochemical machinery inside the rod OS has a gradient of efficacy much larger than previously thought (17,18), demonstrating that the assumption of a homogeneous OS is not true.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…150 ms, the GC * synthesizes about 11-45 cGMP molecules [4,17]. For comparison, in photoreceptors, which also use a cGMP-signalling pathway, a single photon stimulates the hydrolysis of 2,000 to 72,000 cGMP molecules depending on the species [54,55]. Thus, at this stage of signalling, the amplification in photoreceptors is several orders of magnitude larger.…”
Section: The Chemoattractant Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rhodopsin, the visual pigment in photoreceptors, stepwise inactivation by two phosphorylation steps and "capping" of phosphorylated rhodopsin by a "stop" protein has been proposed to control its lifetime and, thereby, reduce photon noise [49][50][51]. However, uniform single-photon responses also involve other mechanisms, including Ca 2+ feedback [52][53][54].…”
Section: The Chemoattractant Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rods demonstrate remarkable single photon sensitivity (1) and unusual reproducibility of a single photon response (2)(3)(4). These features require biochemically perfect signaling cascade with virtually no noise, enormous amplification, and extremely rapid shutoff.…”
Section: Rod Photoreceptors Mediate Night Vision In Vertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%