2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04582-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Key Nodes and Edges by Importance Ranking and Robustness of Regional Rail Transit Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of comprehensive evaluation methods such as relational analysis method and TOPSIS method are used to identify key intersections. Shen [9] used the L-Space method to construct a regional rail transit system, selected complex network indicators such as degree, centrality, and node betweenness, and used the TOPSIS method to identify key nodes. Given that conventional indicators (eg, service level, saturation) only reflect the status of the intersection itself, Guo [10] lack the ability to describe the impact between intersections within the road network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of comprehensive evaluation methods such as relational analysis method and TOPSIS method are used to identify key intersections. Shen [9] used the L-Space method to construct a regional rail transit system, selected complex network indicators such as degree, centrality, and node betweenness, and used the TOPSIS method to identify key nodes. Given that conventional indicators (eg, service level, saturation) only reflect the status of the intersection itself, Guo [10] lack the ability to describe the impact between intersections within the road network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%