“…In addition, females from the different morphotypes showed differences in their antennal response (Břízová et al 2013, Milet-Pinheiro et al 2014), i.e. while the antenna of Tucumán, Argentina (Brazilian-1 morphotype) females responded to ( Z , E )-a-Farnesene, ( E , E )-a-Farnesene, Epianastrephin, ( Z )-3-Nonen-1-ol and ( E , Z )-3,6-Nonadien-1-ol (Břízová et al 2013), the antenna of Alagoas (Brazilian-3 morphotype) females responded to a- Pinene, Limonene, ( Z )-3-Nonen-1-ol and ( E , Z )-3,6-Nonadien-1-ol, (S,S)-(-)-Epianastrephin (Milet-Pinheiro et al 2014). Although it has been shown that these compounds attracted females of the Brazilian-3 morphotype and that the females responded equally to an artificial blend of the synthetic compounds and to volatiles collected from males, it is still not known whether these differences observed at the chemical and electrophysiological level are translated into different behaviors, since the behavioral response to the pheromone of the Argentinean populations is not known yet.…”