2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-006-0110-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of material and geometrical parameters for microstructures by dynamic finite element model updating

Abstract: This paper describes a procedure to identify material and geometrical parameters for microstructures using the concept of finite element model updating. This scheme utilizes measured and finite element analysis (FEA) natural frequencies that are paired together according to their mode shapes, and it incorporates an optimization sequence that formulates the frequency differences as an error vector to be minimized. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure, two examples are shown in this paper. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finite Element Method (FEM) has been extensively implemented for numerically modeling MC based systems [4150]. It has emerged as a promising tool for estimating geometry and bending stiffness of MCs [46], identifying material and geometrical parameters of microstructures [47], verification of analytical models [48] and fabrication [49] of MCs. 3D dynamic behavior of an eight cantilever array structure was analyzed numerically by AFM showing good agreement in lower mode but not in higher modes [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite Element Method (FEM) has been extensively implemented for numerically modeling MC based systems [4150]. It has emerged as a promising tool for estimating geometry and bending stiffness of MCs [46], identifying material and geometrical parameters of microstructures [47], verification of analytical models [48] and fabrication [49] of MCs. 3D dynamic behavior of an eight cantilever array structure was analyzed numerically by AFM showing good agreement in lower mode but not in higher modes [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the related studies are based on a simple lumped-parameters system modeling the biosensor using the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory [21][22][23]. The finite element method has been extensively implemented for numerically modeling MC based systems [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. It has emerged as a promising tool for estimating the geometry and bending stiffness of MCs [29], identifying the material and geometrical parameters of microstructures [30], verification of analytical models [31] and fabrication [32] of MCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method has been extensively implemented for numerically modeling MC based systems [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. It has emerged as a promising tool for estimating the geometry and bending stiffness of MCs [29], identifying the material and geometrical parameters of microstructures [30], verification of analytical models [31] and fabrication [32] of MCs. The 3D dynamic behavior of an eight cantilever array structure was analyzed numerically by atomic force microscopy (AFM) showing good agreement in the lower mode but not in higher modes [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small error in one input parameter can produce large deviations from the true structural responses. In order to obtain a more accurate and reliable finite element (FE) model of a structure, the FE model updating (or tuning) has been an active research area [7][8][9][10]. Usually combined with an optimization technique, an FE model updating procedure modifies the FE model and seeks to minimize the difference between the analysis and the experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%