2021
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of mega‐environments for grain sorghum in Brazil using GGE biplot methodology

Abstract: The performance of genotypes in a wide range of environments can be affected by extensive genotype × environment (G × E) interactions, making the subdivision of the testing environments into relatively more homogeneous groups of locations (mega‐environments) a necessary strategy. The genotype main effects + genotype × environment interaction biplot method (GGE) allows identification of mega‐environments and selection of stable genotypes adapted to specific environments and mega‐environments. The objectives of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the genotypes G25, MTU1010, BG 304, and Yabani LuLu were the best genotypes having the lowest IPCAs values and located in close proximity to the origin. Using AMMI biplots, several investigations were able to identify their corresponding genotypes such as in barley [ 44 ], rice [ 40 ], Sorghum [ 45 ], cassava [ 46 ], and maize [ 47 ]. MTU1010 and Yabani LuLu are among the two groups most productive and stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the genotypes G25, MTU1010, BG 304, and Yabani LuLu were the best genotypes having the lowest IPCAs values and located in close proximity to the origin. Using AMMI biplots, several investigations were able to identify their corresponding genotypes such as in barley [ 44 ], rice [ 40 ], Sorghum [ 45 ], cassava [ 46 ], and maize [ 47 ]. MTU1010 and Yabani LuLu are among the two groups most productive and stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the adaptability and stability of different crops based on biplots have proven the efficiency of this analysis to recommend genotypes and group favorable and unfavorable environments (G. O. Silva et al., 2011; K. J. Silva et al., 2021; Santos et al., 2016; Paramesh et al., 2016; Yokomizo et al., 2017; Olivoto et al., 2019; Albuquerque et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(D. P. D. Cruz et al., 2020; Santos, Ceccon, et al., 2017), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Albuquerque et al., 2022), and sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] (Gomes et al., 2019; K. J. Silva et al., 2021), but there are few reports in the literature about its use in corn for silage production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) to identify two MEs in Midwestern Brazil with contrasting altitudes, levels of fertilizer, and incidence of soybean cyst nematode profiles. da S ilva et al . (2021) and K rishnamurthy et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012), barley (A tlin et al . 2000b), wheat (G eorge and L undy 2019; B ustos -K orts 2017), sorghum ( da S ilva et al . 2021), alfafa (A nnicchiarico 2021), rice (K rishnamurthy et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%