2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00761-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Military Veterans Upon Implementation of a Standardized Screening Process in a Federally Qualified Health Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, although our ability to recruit participants from both VA and community clinics represents a strength of this study, our procedures did not involve speaking to veterans or representatives from the TPAs, potentially limiting generalizability. Fourth, the HRSA data that we used to identify FQHCs serving large numbers of veterans may be incomplete, 44 although our recruitment method was successful in identifying community practices that treated veterans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, although our ability to recruit participants from both VA and community clinics represents a strength of this study, our procedures did not involve speaking to veterans or representatives from the TPAs, potentially limiting generalizability. Fourth, the HRSA data that we used to identify FQHCs serving large numbers of veterans may be incomplete, 44 although our recruitment method was successful in identifying community practices that treated veterans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process has been described elsewhere and resulted in a near ten-fold increase of identified veterans in this FQHC, from approximately 50 veterans before implementation to over 500 after. 26 These results led to specific policy changes regarding the collection of veteran status in FQHCs nationwide beginning in 2020, which are now described in the most recent 2020 UDS reporting manual. 13…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a paucity of descriptive clinical data on existing cross-system collaborations which may help characterize these veterans and aid understanding of conditions for which they may receive treatment across systems. Such data has implications for workforce training, development, and resource allocation [ 2 ]. The objective of this report is to describe different clinical profiles between two mutually exclusive samples: veterans engaged in FQHC only use, and VHA-enrolled veterans engaged in dual VHA and FQHC use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, causality for differences in illness patterns between the two systems also should not be inferred. Future partnerships between FQHC and VHA facilities would benefit from efforts to identify non-enrolled veterans presenting for community care who may gain access to specific VHA services such as mental health [ 2 ]. Efforts by community-based clinics to increase screening and care specifically for PTSD, substance use, and sleep disorder may also benefit veterans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%