2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of mode-I cohesive parameters for bonded interfaces based on DCB test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An effective approach introduced in [14] defines ⇥ ( ) as the standard deviation of the difference between recorded and estimated responses; nevertheless, it has been shown in [12] how their selection is a critical issue that can significantly influence the parameters identification.…”
Section: Inverse Identification Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An effective approach introduced in [14] defines ⇥ ( ) as the standard deviation of the difference between recorded and estimated responses; nevertheless, it has been shown in [12] how their selection is a critical issue that can significantly influence the parameters identification.…”
Section: Inverse Identification Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of their easy-to-use attitude, the applicability of the previous methods is conditioned to a stable propagation of the fracture during the experimental test [12]. In this sense, whenever underlying hypothesis of the theoretical model are not satisfied, the experimental test cannot define any reliable parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…χ * is computed at each step using expressions and conditions in (5). Concerning resolution method, a finite difference method is used to approximate first and second derivatives: for first derivatives, a backward scheme is used and for second derivatives, a centered second order scheme.…”
Section: Numerical Resolution and Algorithmic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, Sorensen and Jacobsen [3] have adopted Li and Ward [4] approach to successfully measure cohesive zone law by deriving energy release rate J with respect to the CTOD. For the second approach, Valoroso and Sessa [5] identify a posteriori an exponential law whose parameters are re-calibrated compared to experimental data. It should be noted that formulation of cohesive zone model mentioned above is made such that damage is embedded in that it corresponds to stiffness variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%