2012
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Molecular Pathway Aberrations in Uterine Serous Carcinoma by Genome-wide Analyses

Abstract: Molecular genetic aberrations involving the p53, cyclin E-FBXW7, and PI3K pathways represent major mechanisms in the development of uterine serous carcinoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

18
176
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
18
176
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We report exome sequencing of a USC cohort five times larger than those recently reported (26,27). The results define the genetic hallmarks of uterine serous cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We report exome sequencing of a USC cohort five times larger than those recently reported (26,27). The results define the genetic hallmarks of uterine serous cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] The aim of this study was to assess specifically the interobserver agreement, recorded by gynecological pathologists from five academic centers across Canada, of histological type in high-grade endometrial carcinomas. A second aim was to correlate morphological diagnosis with a set of six routine immunohistochemical markers (TP53, CDKN2A (p16), ER, PGR, Ki67, and VIM) as well as a set of six experimental immunohistochemical markers (PTEN, ARID1A, CTNNB1, IGF2BP3, HNF1B, and TFF3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since uterine carcinosarcomas are essentially metaplastic high‐grade carcinomas, it may be reasonable to speculate that CNAs may be more prevalent than point mutations, based on extrapolation of the genomic profiling data from high‐grade serous carcinoma 4, 5. With the aim of extending our earlier findings, the present study employed genomic copy number profiling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%