2015
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-9-s6-s4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of network-based biomarkers of cardioembolic stroke using a systems biology approach with time series data

Abstract: BackgroundMolecular signaling of angiogenesis begins within hours after initiation of a stroke and the following regulation of endothelial integrity mediated by growth factor receptors and vascular growth factors. Recent studies further provided insights into the coordinated patterns of post-stroke gene expressions and the relationships between neurodegenerative diseases and neural function recovery processes after a stroke.ResultsDifferential protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs) were constructed at 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-confidence serum NDICP expression waves and protein biomarker candidates for the prediction of disease onset were selected based on the following prioritization criteria: (i) Statistically significant difference ( P  ≤ 0.05) in expression compared to control during the preclinical (pre-onset) stage at either day 5 or day 7 post-immunization ( P  = 0.05 to 1.10E−43); proteins which did not achieve statistical significance during either one of these time points (day 5 or day 7) were excluded. (ii) Biological/functional relevance for neuroinflammatory and demyelinating diseases based on bioinformatic analysis of the pre-onset M2 proteomics datasets (Figure S1 in Supplementary Material), in accordance to previous studies (22). (iii) CNS tissue-specific or primary expression (i.e., NDICPs) based on bioinformatic analysis with tools provided by the EMBL-EBI expression atlas (23), MOPED (24), and ProteomicsDB (25).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…High-confidence serum NDICP expression waves and protein biomarker candidates for the prediction of disease onset were selected based on the following prioritization criteria: (i) Statistically significant difference ( P  ≤ 0.05) in expression compared to control during the preclinical (pre-onset) stage at either day 5 or day 7 post-immunization ( P  = 0.05 to 1.10E−43); proteins which did not achieve statistical significance during either one of these time points (day 5 or day 7) were excluded. (ii) Biological/functional relevance for neuroinflammatory and demyelinating diseases based on bioinformatic analysis of the pre-onset M2 proteomics datasets (Figure S1 in Supplementary Material), in accordance to previous studies (22). (iii) CNS tissue-specific or primary expression (i.e., NDICPs) based on bioinformatic analysis with tools provided by the EMBL-EBI expression atlas (23), MOPED (24), and ProteomicsDB (25).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The reason underlying the attack efficiency of multiple target is easier to understand from the systematic point of view. [29][30][31] In general multiple target attacks are much better because they affect the GEN at more sites if they are distributed in the entire network. 21,23,24 In order to gain much better multiple target attacks, a structure-based and ligand-based drug design has been further discussed in.…”
Section: Multiple Drug Targets Identification Via Systems Biology Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate pathogenetic molecule mechanism, we need to construct the GENs of different stages of disease by big data mining and system identification method via genomewide high throughput data. [13][14][15][16] The systematic design precedence of multiple molecule drugs in Figure 1 will be discussed in detail in the following.…”
Section: Systems Multiple Drug Design With Less Side Effects: Drug Dementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations