2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2009.02285.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of pathotypes of Synchytrium endobioticum found in infested fields in Turkey

Abstract: Pathotypes of four isolates of Synchytrium endobioticum collected from the infested areas of Turkey were determined using Glynne–Lemmerzahl and Spieckermann test methods. Two isolates (Ordu 1 and Nevşehir 1) were tested by the Glynne–Lemmerzahl method in Germany. Ordu 1 was assigned as pathotype 1(D1) whereas the other isolate gave different results in 2 years of testing [pathotype 6(O1) or 18(T1)]. Two other isolates (Nevşehir 2 and Nevşehir 3) were tested using the Spieckermann method in Netherlands. Neither… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Potato sprouts were analyzed under a microscope BioLight 300 (DELTA optical, Poland) to determine the degree of damage according to the following scale, adapted after [13,16]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Potato sprouts were analyzed under a microscope BioLight 300 (DELTA optical, Poland) to determine the degree of damage according to the following scale, adapted after [13,16]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of them matched any of the western European, Czech and Ukrainian pathotypes. The 14 isolates corresponded to seven new distinct pathotypes (Çakır et al 2009 ). Khiutti et al ( 2012 ) studied the resistance reaction of a well-characterized subset of the collection at the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry in Russia.…”
Section: Resistance Breeding and S Endobioticum Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strict phytosanitary measures and the breeding and cultivation of resistant cultivars are the only feasible strategies for controlling potato wart disease. More than 40 different pathotypes of this pathogen have been reported (Baayen et al 2006 ; Çakır et al 2009 ; Przetakiewicz 2015 ), from which pathotypes 1, 2, 6, 8 and 18 are considered the most important forms of the fungus (Stachewicz 2002 ). Pathotype 18 is also considered to be among the most aggressive pathotypes, and only a few resistance genes have been characterized thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%