2007
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of PCA3 (DD3) in prostatic carcinoma by in situ hybridization

Abstract: PCA3 is a specific marker of prostatic carcinoma. However, PCA3 has been detected only at RNA level and a corresponding PCA3 protein has never been identified. The aim of this study was to develop a technique capable of detecting PCA3 RNA on histology sections and to assess the cellular location of the molecule. Fortyeight formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of prostatectomy specimens were selected for PCA3 detection by in situ hybridization by both radioactive and chromogenic methods. Of the 48 sections, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of area can appear histologically normal, albeit molecular changes may still be detectable. Field effect-related observations in PCa 8,9,25,26 led us to the hypothesis that the HBP tissue of PCa patients in this study may have undergone molecular changes with regard to PCA3 and SPINK1 genes and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion events even though the histological examination defined the samples as non-neoplastic. This is further supported not only by the fact that the two cystoprostatectomy samples that presented TMPRSS2-ERG expression, were taken from prostates that in pathologic sectioning studies were found to contain incidental prostate tumor foci, but also by the higher likelihood of the HBP samples to contain detectable TMPRSS2-ERG mRNA if the matched cancerous sample was also TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This type of area can appear histologically normal, albeit molecular changes may still be detectable. Field effect-related observations in PCa 8,9,25,26 led us to the hypothesis that the HBP tissue of PCa patients in this study may have undergone molecular changes with regard to PCA3 and SPINK1 genes and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion events even though the histological examination defined the samples as non-neoplastic. This is further supported not only by the fact that the two cystoprostatectomy samples that presented TMPRSS2-ERG expression, were taken from prostates that in pathologic sectioning studies were found to contain incidental prostate tumor foci, but also by the higher likelihood of the HBP samples to contain detectable TMPRSS2-ERG mRNA if the matched cancerous sample was also TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recently, long noncoding RNA PCA3 has been described as one of the most prostate cancer specific genes (Bussemakers et al, 1999), it was prostate-specific expressed and sharp upregulated in prostate cancer (Bialkowska-Hobrzanska et al, 2006;Popa et al, 2007;Schmidt et al, 2006). To identify whether the promoter elements are responsible for the prostate cancer-specific expression of PCA3, in the prior study, we have isolated genomic DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes in PCa patients and healthy control individuals, and characterized the PCA3 promoter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…DD3 , PCAT3 ), an lncRNA identified in 1999 via differential display analysis [33]. PCA3 is specifically expressed in prostate epithelial cells, and—compared with benign tissue— PCA3 is highly overexpressed in PCa and high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia [33–35]. PCA3 is an antisense intronic lncRNA located in the tumor-suppressive protein-coding gene PRUNE2 .…”
Section: Ncrnas As Biomarkers For the Minimally Invasive Management Omentioning
confidence: 99%