1984
DOI: 10.2307/145565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Physician-Induced Demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, insurers do not audit suspicious cases when costs are high enough, representing costly state verification in the standard theoretical framework. 18 As we have shown, average claim amounts are 16 See for example Arrow (1963) and Rossiter and Wilensky (1984). 17 Mayers and Smith (1981).…”
Section: How Do the Insurers React?mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this sense, insurers do not audit suspicious cases when costs are high enough, representing costly state verification in the standard theoretical framework. 18 As we have shown, average claim amounts are 16 See for example Arrow (1963) and Rossiter and Wilensky (1984). 17 Mayers and Smith (1981).…”
Section: How Do the Insurers React?mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Like Rossiter and Wilensky [2], Tussing [1,3] had the advantage of utilisation data that could distinguish between physicianinitiated and patient-initiated visits. He asked patients attending GPs whether the present consultation was their own or the GP's idea and in addition, whether the visit led to a future return visit being arranged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus if there is a higher incidence of underlying health problems in those areas with the highest physician density then a positive correlation may be observed between density and utilisation, even though no inducement is taking place. 2 Despite numerous studies analysing SID in this context, evidence in favour of SID has been mixed. In a sequence of papers examining SID in the Norwegian health system, Carlsen and Grytten [5],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Moreover, suppliers' location choice (reverse causality) or excess demand for care might be responsible for a positive relationship between the supply density and the expenditure. One effective way to do so is to employ a two-part model, which divides total medical costs into two components: the probability of receiving medical services, and medical costs per patient (see, e.g., Escarce (1992), Rossiter and Wilensky (1984)). Using such an approach, Escarce (1992), for example, found that physician density affects the share of patients who go to receive medical services, but it does not affect the medical expenditure for the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%