2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-4947-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of piroplasm infection in questing ticks by RLB: a broad range extension of tick-borne piroplasm in China?

Abstract: Sensitive and specific diagnostic method for rapid and simultaneous detection and discrimination of the different species is needed for an effective control of piroplasmosis. Here, a reverse line blot (RLB) assay was developed for piroplasm detection. A general pair of primer based on 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was used to amplify V4 region of 18S rRNA gene. General and specific probes for 13 piroplasm species were cited from previous publications or designed according to the alignment of 18S rRNA gene sequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protection rate in the vaccinated groups was 100% and it is closely similar to the finding recorded in China which ranged from 99.5 to 99.9% [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens was detected through the RLB assay which is more sensitive when compared to blood smears, PCR, and nested PCR, suggesting that all co-infection occurred at low levels 2,36 . The higher co-infections in the unvaccinated (control) group compared to the vaccinated group could be attributed to the heterologous or non-specific immunological effects (NSE) that can be induced when using live attenuated vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protection rate in the vaccinated groups was 100% and it is closely similar to the finding recorded in China which ranged from 99.5 to 99.9% [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens was detected through the RLB assay which is more sensitive when compared to blood smears, PCR, and nested PCR, suggesting that all co-infection occurred at low levels 2,36 . The higher co-infections in the unvaccinated (control) group compared to the vaccinated group could be attributed to the heterologous or non-specific immunological effects (NSE) that can be induced when using live attenuated vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protection rate in the vaccinated groups was 100% and it is closely similar to the nding recorded in China which ranged from 99.5-99.9% [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] . Co-infection with other tick-borne pathogens was detected through the RLB assay which is more sensitive when compared to blood smears, PCR, and nested PCR, suggesting that all co-infection occurred at low levels 2,34 . The higher co-infections in nonvaccinated (Control) group when compared with the vaccinated one could be attributed to the heterologous or non-speci c immunological effects (NSE) that may be induced when live-attenuated vaccines are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a scenario, utilization of generic primers poses the problem of correct allocation to the respective species or species complex. DNA sequencing without prior cloning of the less prevalent amplicons is often unsuccessful or distorts the whole readout making it at times incomprehensible [21]. Furthermore, the pathogen concentration in the host blood varies dramatically depending on the animal’s state of infection, making the identification challenging when present in very low concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%