2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of potato cyst nematode resistant genotypes using molecular markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For potatoes a successful stacking of the major R-genes involved in monogenic control of resistance to pathogens was reported in a number of papers [39,44,50,53,81]. Several studies demonstrate the potential of MAS for stacking of QTLs involved in the control of quantitative resistance to G. pallida, pathotype Pa2/Pa3 [45,82,83] as well as for pyramiding of QTLs conferring resistance to both PCN species-G. pallida, pathotype Pa2/3 and G. rostochiensis, pathotype Ro5 [41,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. The efficiency of such breeding programs can be significantly improved using marker-assisted selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For potatoes a successful stacking of the major R-genes involved in monogenic control of resistance to pathogens was reported in a number of papers [39,44,50,53,81]. Several studies demonstrate the potential of MAS for stacking of QTLs involved in the control of quantitative resistance to G. pallida, pathotype Pa2/Pa3 [45,82,83] as well as for pyramiding of QTLs conferring resistance to both PCN species-G. pallida, pathotype Pa2/3 and G. rostochiensis, pathotype Ro5 [41,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. The efficiency of such breeding programs can be significantly improved using marker-assisted selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to results of molecular marker analysis the majority of commercial potato cultivars which are highly resistant to the most wide-spread Ro1 pathotype of G. rostochiensis have the major H1 gene from S. tuberosum ssp. andigena while the Gro1-4 gene from S. spegazzini is much less common [36][37][38][39][40][41]43,53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presence/absence marker generates a 226 bp amplicon from resistant sources, and the diagnostic value of the SPUD1636 marker to identify sources of resistance was demonstrated for some accessions of S. vernei as well as varieties and breeding lines ( Bryan et al, 2002 ). The marker has also been adapted for MAS in a Spanish resistance breeding programme ( Ortega and Lopez-Vizcon, 2012 ) and used for resistance screening by Sudha et al (2016) . However, it has turned out to be inefficient in selecting breeding lines ( Milczarek et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Breeding For Pcn Resistance and The Development Of Molecular Markers For Marker Assisted Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Из 812 сортов и селекционных клонов японского селекцентра NARO (Хоккайдо) у 33 % образцов были выявлены маркеры гена Н1, в то же время ни один из протестированных образцов не обладал маркером гена Gro1-4 (Asano et al, 2012). Аналогично в выборке из 58 се лекционных клонов индийской селекции около 60 % генотипов имели маркеры гена H1, а генотипов с маркером гена Gro1-4 не обнаружено (Sudha et al, 2016(Sudha et al, , 2019. При этом около 20 % из 217 протестированных образцов коллекции UACh Университета Южного Чили оказались MASпозитивными в скрининге с маркером гена Gro1-4 (López et al, 2015).…”
Section: G Rostochiensis (зкн)unclassified