2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of potential interferents of methylmalonic acid: A previously unrecognized pitfall in clinical diagnostics and newborn screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using hyphenated HPLC-NMR spectroscopy, Monostory et al [72] identified a previously unknown interference in the routine analysis of the dried blood spots (DBSs) used in inborn screening, affecting the methylmalonic acid determination of PA patients. Thus, their paper reports on the identification of five isobaric (same molecular mass) compounds in serum and urine from MMA and PA patients, which elute close to methylmalonic acid, inducing errors in the identification and quantitation of the latter.…”
Section: Non-localized Ex Vivo Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscop...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using hyphenated HPLC-NMR spectroscopy, Monostory et al [72] identified a previously unknown interference in the routine analysis of the dried blood spots (DBSs) used in inborn screening, affecting the methylmalonic acid determination of PA patients. Thus, their paper reports on the identification of five isobaric (same molecular mass) compounds in serum and urine from MMA and PA patients, which elute close to methylmalonic acid, inducing errors in the identification and quantitation of the latter.…”
Section: Non-localized Ex Vivo Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscop...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of these isobaric compounds, only succinate has been previously reported to interfere with methylmalonic acid in the MS analysis of DBSs. The study used both DBSs and urine and performed several NMR experiments including 1 H NMR, HSQC, HMBC and TOCSY, recorded at 500 and 600 MHz [72].…”
Section: Non-localized Ex Vivo Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscop...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic specificity can be further increased by confirmatory assays utilizing chromatographic separation of diagnostically important analytes (including MMA, MCA, HCY and rarely 3-hydroxy-propionic acid) from their isobaric substances, i.e., from those having the same molecular mass [25,68,69]. In addition to succinate, the only metabolite considered earlier as an interference for MMA, further five potential isobaric interferents have been identified recently [70]. The urinary organic acid assay by means of GC-MS performs well in separating isobaric interferences that could compromise diagnosis and an accurate quantification [65].…”
Section: Nbs Protocols and New Candidate Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the number and impact of false positives remains a central challenge to NBS and is the major purpose of second‐tier testing of the original dried blood spot (DBS) from all newborns with a positive NBS result 7,8 . In contrast to first‐tier screening using direct injection analysis, second‐tier tests often use liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) to increase specificity by distinguishing isomeric compounds 9–12 and evaluating additional disease‐related metabolites 3,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Reducing the number and impact of false positives remains a central challenge to NBS and is the major purpose of second-tier testing of the original dried blood spot (DBS) from all newborns with a positive NBS result. 7,8 In contrast to first-tier screening using direct injection analysis, second-tier tests often use liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to increase specificity by distinguishing isomeric compounds [9][10][11][12] and evaluating additional disease-related metabolites. 3,13 False-positive cases can also be reduced using postanalytic tools applied to first-tier screening data with the Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), [14][15][16] and more recently using machine learningbased methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%